Foreign Entanglements IRCF v1.0

⚠️ Disclaimer

This visualization and all IRCF ratings are based entirely on the research, analysis, and personal judgment of a single individual — Ashton Jenson. They do not represent the views of any government, institution, or organization.

These ratings are subjective assessments and should be taken with a grain of salt. Reasonable people can and will disagree on many of these scores. The goal is to provide a useful framework for thinking about international relations, not to present definitive truth.

This project is a living document. Ratings will be updated as new information comes to light and as geopolitical events unfold.

Got it

📐 Interstate Relations Categorization Framework (IRCF)

A standardized system for categorizing bilateral interstate relations across eight independent dimensions, enabling nuanced composite assessments of how any two states relate to each other.

Universal Grading Scale

Grade	Meaning	Character
AAA	Maximum integration or alignment	Full unification / shared systems
AA	Deep, structured connection	Treaty-level bonds, extensive institutional ties
A	Strong, active engagement	Regular high-level interaction, meaningful cooperation
B	Moderate, functional relations	Standard operating relationships with some friction
C	Limited engagement	Minimal interaction, selective or narrow contact
D	Restricted or adversarial tendency	Active barriers, tension, or divergence
E	Hostile or covert conflict	Covert operations, proxy actions, gray-zone activity
F	Severe breakdown	Formal breaks, comprehensive sanctions, isolation
FF	Escalated conflict	Active military confrontation short of full war
FFF	Open warfare	Sustained, large-scale armed conflict

Qualifier Tags

Tag	Meaning
↑	Trending positive / improving
↓	Trending negative / deteriorating
~	Volatile / unstable
!	Asymmetric relationship
§	Sanctioned relationship

Dimension 1: Security Relations

Measures the depth of military and defense cooperation, from full integration to open warfare.

Grade	Label	Definition
AAA	Complete Integration	Shared nuclear capabilities, unified command structures, fully integrated defense
AA	Strategic Alliance	Formal mutual defense treaty, major basing agreements, joint exercises
A	Security Partnership	Regular defense cooperation, arms sales, joint training
B	Limited Cooperation	Basic military-to-military contact, occasional exercises
C	Minimal Contact	No meaningful military relationship
D	Security Competition	Active military rivalry, arms buildups, competing spheres of influence
E	Gray-Zone Conflict	Cyber warfare, covert operations, proxy support against each other
F	Proxy Conflict	Actively supporting opposing sides in third-party conflicts
FF	Direct Confrontation	Active border skirmishes, limited armed engagements
FFF	Open War	Sustained large-scale armed conflict

Dimension 2: Economic Relations

Measures the depth of trade, investment, and economic integration.

Grade	Label	Definition
AAA	Integrated Market	Harmonized regulations, free movement of goods/services/capital/labor
AA	Deep Partnership	Comprehensive FTA, extensive cross-border investment
A	Strategic Trade	Major trade partnership with significant bilateral flows
B	Standard Trade	Normal commercial relations under WTO rules
C	Limited Trade	Below-average trade volumes, few investment ties
D	Restricted Trade	Targeted sanctions, export controls, partial barriers
E	Broad Sanctions	Comprehensive sectoral sanctions, financial restrictions
F	Economic Warfare	Near-total embargo, comprehensive sanctions, financial isolation

Dimension 3: Diplomatic Relations

Measures the depth and quality of formal state-to-state diplomatic engagement.

Grade	Label	Definition
AAA	Unified Position	Consistent policy alignment, joint diplomatic initiatives
AA	Strategic Coordination	Regular policy alignment, frequent leader-level consultation
A	Cooperative Relations	Positive diplomatic engagement, shared interests
B	Standard Diplomacy	Full diplomatic relations, normal embassy operations
C	Cool Relations	Formal ties maintained but with notable friction
D	Diplomatic Tension	Reduced presence, recalled ambassadors, public disputes
E	Severed Relations	No formal ties but indirect channels exist
F	Complete Break	No diplomatic relations, no communication channels

Dimension 4: Cultural Relations

Measures the breadth of societal exchange, diaspora connections, tourism, and people-to-people contact.

Grade	Label	Definition
AAA	Shared Cultural Space	Integrated daily cultural life, shared language/media
AA	Deep Connection	Shared language or deep overlap, extensive media cross-pollination
A	Strong Exchange	Extensive mutual influence, significant tourism, active cultural industries
B	Regular Interaction	Steady exchange with notable barriers, significant diaspora
C	Limited Exchange	Selective interaction, minimal mass-culture penetration
D	Minimal Contact	Few cultural touchpoints, little tourism, small diaspora
F	Cultural Isolation	No meaningful exchange, information barriers, travel restrictions

Dimension 5: Values Alignment

Measures convergence of governance philosophies, legal frameworks, and state-society conceptions. Dyadic — measures alignment between the pair, not against a universal standard.

Grade	Label	Definition
AAA	Complete Alignment	Shared governance philosophy, comparable legal systems
AA	Strong Alignment	Same broad governance model with minor differences
A	Compatible Systems	Similar model with notable variations in implementation
B	Partial Convergence	Similar aspirations but significant gaps in capacity or application
C	Mixed Alignment	Select shared features but fundamental differences on key questions
D	Systemic Divergence	Fundamentally different philosophies with few points of convergence
F	Systemic Opposition	Actively hostile to each other's governance model

Dimension 6: Institutional Integration

Measures the degree to which two states are embedded in shared international organizations, treaties, and multilateral frameworks.

Grade	Label	Definition
AAA	Deep Fusion	Shared supranational governance with common binding institutions
AA	Integrated Alliance	Same core military alliance + multiple overlapping memberships
A	Extensive Shared	Multiple shared org memberships, some binding frameworks
B	Moderate Overlap	Some shared memberships but few binding frameworks
C	Minimal Connection	Few shared memberships beyond universal bodies
D	Institutional Opposition	Competing or rival institutional blocs
F	Institutional Exclusion	Excluded from major institutions, no shared frameworks

Dimension 7: Intelligence Sharing

Measures intelligence cooperation depth — often the most trust-revealing indicator. Intelligence relationships frequently diverge from public diplomatic posture.

Grade	Label	Definition
AAA	Fully Integrated	Institutionalized multi-domain sharing, shared collection infrastructure
AA	Strategic Sharing	Broad sharing across multiple domains, formalized agreements
A	Selective Sharing	Regular exchange on specific shared threats
B	Limited Sharing	Occasional exchange through liaison relationships
C	Minimal Sharing	Very little exchange, narrow or situational
D	Intel Competition	Active counterintelligence focus, espionage concerns
F	Intel Warfare	Active hostile operations targeting each other

Dimension 8: Economic Interdependence

Measures mutual economic dependence and its asymmetry. Distinct from Economic Relations (Dim 2) — this measures how much disruption each side would suffer from a break.

Grade	Label	Definition
AAA	Symmetric Deep	Both economies deeply reliant; separation would cause severe mutual damage
AA	Asymmetric Deep	Very high interdependence but one side more dependent
A	Significant	Important relationship for both; disruption would be painful but manageable
B	Moderate	Meaningful trade but neither critically dependent
C	Low	Limited ties relative to each economy's size
D	One-Sided	One state highly dependent, creating leverage asymmetry
F	None	No meaningful economic ties; separation is the status quo

Close

≥ at least = exactly ≤ at most All grades FFF FF F E D C B A AA AAA